သတင်းများ

✨ Core Goal: Design a cost-effective ferrite motor with stable performance (target: cost reduction by 20%-30% compared with rare earth permanent magnet motors) How to design a ferrite motor to save costs? Compared with rare earth permanent magnet motors, ferrite permanent magnet motors have the advantages of high demagnetization resistance (high temperature resistance, applicable to -40℃~150℃ working environment) and low cost (material cost is only 1/5~1/3 of rare earth magnets). However, their low residual magnetism leads to low air-gap magnetic density (only 0.3~0.5T) and insufficient permanent magnet torque (about 80% of rare earth motor torque under the same power). Therefore, the key problem is to solve the low torque density while saving a lot of costs. There are two solutions: ✅ Solution 1: IPM Motor Adopt built-in permanent magnets or tangential flux design. Each pole’s magnetic flux is provided by two parallel magnets, which can increase the air-gap magnetic density to 0.6~0.8T, making up for the low residual magnetism of ferrite and improving magnetic density by 20%~30%. ✅ Solution 2: Permanent Magnet Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor Use IPM rotor structure to increase the saliency ratio by 15%~25%, and make up for the insufficient permanent magnet torque with reluctance torque, increasing the overall output torque by 10%~15%. 📌 Classic Case: Multi-layer U-shaped rotor structure – ✅ Performance: Effectively improve magnetoresistive torque and power density, the motor efficiency can reach 88%~92% (same as rare earth motors) – ✅ Cooling: Equipped with liquid cooling system and spiral cavity aluminum shell, reducing the motor temperature rise by 15~20℃, ensuring long-term stable operation – ✅ Stability: Multi-layer arrangement and rotor stack design, the demagnetization resistance is increased by 30%~40%, and it can withstand high load and short-circuit faults – ✅ Cost-Saving: Uniform-size permanent magnets reduce processing costs by 10%~15%, and the overall motor cost is 40%~60% lower than that of rare earth permanent magnet motors 📢 Supplier Info: Source: Network Comprehensive. We are a professional supplier offerrite magnetic tiles (arc magnets), with a monthly supply capacity of 200T, and the customization cycle is 7~15 working days. For quotation, customization and consultation, please contact us. 📩 shirley@gaumumagnet.com

Air-gap Magnetic Field Produced by 2-pole and 4-pole Magnetic Tiles Under Different Magnetization Methods In permanent magnet motors, multiple magnetic tiles (one tile per pole) are commonly used, mainly made of NdFeB or ferrite. The magnet is composed of 2 or even dozens of magnetic tiles. The commonly used magnetization methods include: 📌 Parallel Magnetization 📌 Radial Magnetization This paper focuses on the air-gap magnetic field generated by 2-pole and 4-pole magnetic tiles under the two magnetization methods mentioned above. 🔍 Case Study: 3 kW, 100 kr/min High-speed Motor ▶️ 2-pole Magnetic Tiles The figure below shows the air-gap magnetic field distribution waveforms under different magnetization methods: – Radial Magnetization: • Air-gap magnetic field: Close to a trapezoidal waveform • Fourier decomposition results: – Fundamental component: Only 91.2% of that under parallel magnetization – 3rd harmonic: 16.3% of the fundamental component – 5th harmonic: 3.8% of the fundamental component – 7th harmonic: 1.0% of the fundamental component • Conclusion: The 5th and higher-order harmonics are very small. ▶️ 4-pole Magnetic Tiles The figure below shows the air-gap magnetic field distribution waveforms under different magnetization methods: – Key Feature: The 5th and higher-order harmonics are negligible. – Parallel Magnetization: 3rd harmonic = 4.2% of the fundamental component – Radial Magnetization: 3rd harmonic = 6.2% of the fundamental component 💡 Critical Finding Compared with radial magnetization, parallel magnetization can increase the fundamental air-gap magnetic field by 26.7%. 📊 Final Analysis Parallel magnetization makes the air-gap magnetic field close to a sinusoidal distribution, and is beneficial to improving the fundamental component of the magnetic field and the effective electromagnetic torque. 📩 shirley@gaumumagnet.com

Choosing the wrong magnet grade can lead to motor inefficiency or unnecessary costs. Here is a 7-step checklist to help you select the perfect permanent magnet for your application: 1️⃣ Know Your Motor Type ● General/Home Appliances/Toys: Economical Ferrite is usually sufficient. ● Automotive/Servo Motors: Choose grades with higher stability and uniformity. 2️⃣ Select the Magnetic Grade ● Y30: Cost-effective, for general requirements. ● Y35: The “Sweet Spot” – best value for money and most widely used. ● Y40/Y46: For high torque and compact designs requiring higher performance.
💡 Tip: Don’t blindly choose high numbers. Meet the performance requirement to control costs. 3️⃣ Check the Specs
Ensure the arc length, thickness, and tolerance match your stator perfectly. Thickness directly influences flux and demagnetization risk. 4️⃣ Consider the Environment ● High Temp: Choose high-temperature resistant grades. ● Humid/Dusty: Ensure the magnet is dense, crack-free. 5️⃣ Magnetization & Poles
Confirm the number of poles (2, 4, 6, 8…) and direction (Radial/Multi-pole) to match your rotor design. 6️⃣ Surface & Assembly
Look for smooth surfaces without air pores. Decide on assembly methods (gluing vs. snapping) early to ensure dimensional accuracy. 7️⃣ Cost Efficiency
Ferrite is the king of cost-performance. Don’t switch to expensive Neodymium unless you absolutely have to. Need help selecting the right grade for your project?
We specialize in high-quality Ferrite Magnets (Y30-Y40). DM me for a free consultation or quote! 📩 shirley@gaumumagnet.com FerriteMagnet